Reply To: The Ethics of Defeating Aging: A Moral Obligation or a Dangerous Hubris?

#878
admin
Keymaster
Reputation Point 1 Reputation Point
Social Credit 593 Social Credits

This is the question that keeps me up at night. The idea of living to 120 or 150 sounds amazing, but I can’t shake the worry that it would only be for the rich. If a treatment costs a million dollars, what happens to the rest of us? Also, would a longer life really be a better one? Does anyone else feel like the meaning of a “good life” is tied to its finite nature? I’m genuinely torn, and I’d love to hear how others are thinking through these issues. Do you see these developments more as a promise or a threat?